Afghanistan: December 11, 2002

Archives

  Foreign aid organizations, mainly European, are complaining that they are not getting enough protection in some of the more unruly areas. The same groups complain when US troops provide aid for Afghans. The aid groups believe that this makes all aid providers targets and that US troops should be spending more time protecting aid workers. The US military responds that this twisted logic is absurd and that for decades US troops have worked on foreign aid projects and, in fact, you want armed US troops working aid jobs in dangerous projects. Moreover, the US has no intention of just providing bodyguards for aid groups that often ignore advice on US troops about areas that are considered highly dangerous for foreigners.  The civilian aid groups want to call the shots on where aid efforts go and don't want competition from the troops. Many of these aid groups opposed the war in Afghanistan in the first place and now oppose any action to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

X

ad

Help Keep StrategyPage Open

First came Facebook, then came Twitter, and finally, AI has arrived. They have all caused a decline in our business, but AI may be the deadliest innovation. We are currently in survival mode. Our writers and staff receive no payment in some months, and even when they do, it is below the minimum wage for their efforts. You can support us with your donations or subscriptions. Please help us keep our doors open.

Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on X.

Subscribe   Donate   Close